Chen Mingwen's 3 Million High-speed E-commerce Photo Editing

You can start new topic to this forum.
Post Reply
sohag
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2022 6:48 am

Chen Mingwen's 3 Million High-speed E-commerce Photo Editing

Post by sohag »

In September 2019, DPP legislator Chen Mingwen left a card suitcase on the high-speed rail during the election. That morning, the high-speed rail personnel found the lost property and found that there was 3 million yuan in cash, which caused heated discussions. Not only did netizens knock the bowls to watch the show, but the series even continued Chen Mingwen's "Precious Milk Terrier" who funded his son's business in the Philippines, and worked hard. . Chen Mingwen has strong political strength and is known as the "King of Chiayi". However, because the suitcase containing the money goes against the trend of digital payment in modern society, the outside world has questioned that the source of Chen Mingwen's money is not pure. The opponent, former legislator Lin Guoqing, attacked violently.

Lin Guoqing was sentenced to 1.2 million yuan in compensation by the Chiayi District Court for defaming and insulting Chen Mingwen during the election. Chen Mingwen said that the 1.2 million yuan will be donated to the nursery for public welfare. After a lengthy investigation into the 3 million high-speed rail incident, the prosecutors finally checked the four aspects of money laundering prevention and control, unknown property sources, tax collection, and property declaration, and they did not prosecute. Internet public trials E-Commerce Photo Editing
often lead to guilt, but the truth after the event is always lacking.

Behind the 3 million high-speed rail incident, what is the key factor in not prosecuting? Why after a large-scale investigation, the money laundering, corruption regulations or tax evasion are not prosecuted? Key 1: The source of the money is legitimate, and there is no disguise or concealment of intent Chen Mingwen once publicly stated that because his son Chen Zhengting had a need for foreign investment, he brought 3 million cash to Taipei to lend to his son, and it was only because the money was accidentally lost. According to Article 2 of the new Law on the Prevention
Post Reply